ADDIE Rewired, Phase 2: Design

By Mark Diaz |

ADDIE Rewired, Phase 2: Design

In Analysis, you figured out the problem. You learned who the learners are, what they are struggling with, and what "fixed" would look like. You wrote it all down. That is your starting point.

Design is the next step. This is where you decide what the course will actually teach and how it will be built. Think of Analysis as the diagnosis and Design as the treatment plan.

When people new to this try to use AI in Design, they almost always jump straight to the storyboard. A storyboard is the screen-by-screen plan for the course, the document that says what shows up on each slide. They have AI write the on-screen text and lay out the screens, and it feels like progress.

Here is the catch. The storyboard is the last thing you make in Design, not the first. By the time you are filling it in, the big decisions are already done. What are the learning goals? What order do you teach things in? How will you check that people learned? If those are wrong, a faster storyboard just helps you build the wrong course faster.

The real hours in Design do not go into laying out slides. They go into the planning. Writing the goals, putting them in order, and making sure your quiz actually tests what you taught. That work is part thinking and part paperwork. The thinking is yours. The paperwork is what AI is good at speeding up.

Here is the full breakdown: what stays human, what AI handles, the tools to use, and how this holds up at scale.


What stays human



What AI handles



The tools to use


You do not need a fancy setup. Keep it simple and stay in charge of your own files.

For writing goals, use an AI chat tool like ChatGPT or Claude, and feed it your Analysis notes. The better your notes, the better the goals. If you put in junk, you get junk back.

For the goal-and-quiz table, take what the AI gives you and paste it into a spreadsheet you control. You want to be able to sort it and mark the gaps yourself.

For the order and the rough storyboard, let AI draft, then move the result into your own storyboard template, the one you already use to build the course.

That is the one rule for all of it. AI drafts into your format. You never bend your process to match its format. The moment you start working the way the tool wants, you have given away the part of the job that was supposed to stay yours.


At scale


One short module is easy to plan by hand. A big course is where a good workflow really pays off.

At that size, you do not make a separate plan for every module from scratch. You make one plan and reuse it. One set of goals, drafted fast and checked by you. One storyboard template, used again and again. The same goal-and-quiz table for every module, in the same shape, so anyone reviewing it reads each module the same way.

This is where the time savings get real. Writing goals and tests for a full course by hand is days of work, and it is the kind of work that gets rushed when a deadline is close. With AI drafting and you reviewing, it is hours. You still make every call. The difference is you spend your time deciding instead of typing.

That is the whole point. You are not making prettier slides faster. You are making the right decisions in the right order, with the paperwork handled, so the build that comes next is clean.

Design is decision work. The slides are just where those decisions show up.


With the plan finished, building the course stops being a guessing game and becomes simple execution. That is Phase 3.


*ADDIE, Rewired: A five-part series on where AI actually fits in the process you already use.*